Yes No. Sorry this didn't help. Thanks for your feedback. This thread is locked. You can follow the question or vote as helpful, but you cannot reply to this thread. I have the same question Report abuse. Details required :. Moreover, SPAs permit you to observe network procedures and examine page elements and data connected with them. These web applications like Saucony, for instance, comprise a perfect beginning, middle, and finish.
The Saucony web application development offers an outstanding interactive user experience utilizing parallax scrolling and astonishing transitions and effects to display the whole customer journey. With SPA, scrolling is suitable and incessant; there is no requirement to click on infinite links. Certainly, the scrolling trait of SPA makes them impeccably suited for the mobile users who have become habituated to scrolling.
But with all the above-mentioned single page application advantages, it also has some disadvantages that you must consider. This refers to the fact that when the users click the back button, they will not go back. A browser simply takes the user to the previous page, not to the previous state in an application. This is the reason that single-page applications function on JavaScript and download the data on request from the client-server.
It is difficult to optimize the websites for search engines as most of the pages cannot be scanned through search bots. In recent times, Google launched a novel scheme to upsurge single-page application SEO optimization. Google currently indexes active pages. For this, the developers have to make sure that the JavaScript files can be indexed through Google as it executes them in its crawler.
Single-page applications are less protected from cross-site scripting XSS attacks as compared to multi-page apps. Utilizing XSS, hackers can insert clientside scripts into web apps. One security trouble is the disclosure of sensitive data. If developers are not cautious about what the data is contained in the initial page load, they can simply send data that should not be exposed to all the users.
The complete SPA approach is not normally visible in browsers, which can deliver an untrue sense of security. One more motive that SPA can be insecure is the absence of access control at the operational level. Since the developers move characteristics and logic off the server and out to the client, it is easy to present a client with access to functions that it should not be permitted to employ.
If you want to combine some functionaqlities of single page application like mobile-friendliness and faster load times with SEO-friendly and better security features of multi-page application, Progressive Web Apps PWAs are a good option. You can read our comprensive guide on Progrssive Web Apps for more information.
A single-page application is an application that interrelates with the users by robustly rewriting the existing web pages with novel data from the server, instead of the default technique of the browser loading complete new pages. The main advantage of a single-page application is its speed. The thing that alters is the data that is conveyed to and from the server. As a consequence, the app is very receptive to user queries and does not have to pause for client-server communication.
Single page applications are an incredible tool for creating engaging and exceptional experiences for users. Facebook is one of the most popular example of Signle Page application today.
Single page applications fit seamlessly for developing robust platforms with minor data volumes. Additionally, a single-page app is perfect as a base for future mobile app development. SPAs are about providing an exceptional UX by trying to replicate a natural setting in the browser — no page reloads and no additional wait time. This pattern is outstanding for social networks, SaaS platforms, and closed communities where search engine optimization does not matter. Contact Monocubed , where we understand and define the technical requirements of your project and would deliver a dynamic solution.
With ideals of quality, commitment, and perseverance, he believes in creating lasting business relationships with the clients. All our projects are secured by NDA. Zero Spam. We are extremely pleased with the progress of the project and satisfied with a job well done.
They were very attentive and responsive to any changes we required. The web platform has standardized our way of working. Our sales team is now delivering more accurate estimates and project proposals.
We will validate your idea and provide a personalized quote. These features are easier to add ;. Because many things in life happen to be achievable in several ways and that the easiest is not always the best.
Think of implications. Check out Zotero if you want to archive Web pages organised in a database. Attach keywords and notes. I have. Great idea on paper. I tried all the available academic programs such as Zotero. My conclusion is you might find them useful if you absolutely need their core function, which is quoting academic sources in a standardised way.
Actually, I have Zotero and its add-on installed. I just tried it once more, and I hit this problem :. Trying to debug port problems just to save a freaking Web page is a bit over the top. Meanwhile, Mozilla is busy saving the world. In FF the background dims, but it just sits there and does nothing. Yes, I save pages fairly regularly. Who knows when they might disappear. Not on AMO, or then under another name.
Not sure what you are talking about. No one said MozArchiver was any of those things or that it was meant for Firefox. I think most of us focus on an article, seems not all of us.
Less is more: please stop spamming the place with lengthy, pointless chit-chat posts and try to concentrate on the subject at hand, only posting when you have actually something useful to say. You could have avoided this by Googling as anyone else in a few seconds, but being a smart ass ultimately seemed like the better option. I think your problem is somewhat related to brains.
Your comment just happened at a time I was elsewhere annoyed. No problem. It may, I let you judge. It has some unique features and vice-versa. Hi, I just tested your extension.
Your extension will result in large size for some pages. I hope that someday you will add the conversion feature. I have many MHT files need to be converted.
Opening them one by one will take a long time.. Note that you can save multiple tabs in one click by selecting them first for example with shift-click. Note that your it may be a hard time for your CPU.
Save Page WE: 1. My suggestion is that the added information may be dismissed once it has been displayed and viewed. It gets in the way, and you might want to have a screenshot of the page. View Page Source is a developer comand. And it needs a click. Where is the original url in that mess?
Clairvaux, sugestions, suggestions, suggestions… what are you looking for : SingleFile-Clairvaux. A Clairvaux-tailored extension? What a pain. You might want to tone down the obnoxiousness. It seems this developer, for one, is interested in my suggestions. Why do you insist on bossing people around, and speaking on behalf of others? Testing is a major part of software development. Some people volunteer to write software, others volunteer to try it and offer feedback. This is a good thing, not a bad thing as you purport to make it.
Not everybody is Microsoft, and can afford paid-for user testing. Or at least explain why you think mine are not good ideas? I thought tech blogs were places where people expressed their opinions and wishes on all things digital.
Clairvaux, take it cool. I must have missed your apology, though. I guess I was trying to get things relaxed. Off to elsewhere now. Single Page manages it in KB. Nothing scientific, of course, but I just tried to save a media page and an Amazon page both more complex than Ghacks. Single Page freezes Firefox, before letting go.
Default settings for both. Save Page WE flags an inordinate number of unloadable items on the Amazon page 35 out of Could you provide both urls so that I have a look simple curiosity, no challenging in mid?
Save Page WE, on the other hand, completes the task. It does take a while however, and most images are lacking. Plus, some items in Chosen seem to overlap with items in Standard. Browsers have become operating systems. Far too many core features have been delegated to extension developers, who cannot possibly cope. Just being able to save a web page in a single file, for later referral, in a universal format, is obviously a basic requirement. I also remember, from the time printing was a more universal output method than nowadays, that Internet Explorer did it best.
Just wait a few seconds and there you go with that heavy page perfectly archived 9. Generally speaking I better understand your approach which is techie-led. Clairvaux Thanks for the URL example. I confirm that SingleFile has some difficulties when it tries to optimize the page before processing it.
The saved page will be a bit bigger though. I agree that browsers should offer the feature out of the box. I implemented SingleFile at a time there was zero options on Chrome. Clairvaux: Thanks a lot for all your feedback! Could you give an example of URL? You can send me an email via the Firefox addon page. Firefox became WebExtension and it became unusable, so Waterfox and Pale Moon were indispensable as workarounds.
But the disadvantages can be solved likely. Indeed, SingleFile is made up well. And I feel respectful for the dedicated Reply from the author against this topic.
As long as there are such amazing add-on developers, Mozilla will be saved. Email alerts with new comments are sent before comments are moderated. This makes subscribing to comments largerly useless. Attempts to reply to a comment are often fruitless. Would it be possible to withold the email until the comment is published? Also, could the link in the subscription request be made clickable?
Thank you for your attention. Just shut the fuck up, Tom Hawack, will you? Who do you think you are? Why do you feel the need to interfere, and in such a rude manner? Remains the fact a blog is a public area and that commenting is not interfering : your lack of education is as notorious as your damn character. Forget it. I would say : once again. Other people have made the remark to you. Maybe you could think it over. Before that, you thought it appropriate to bereate me on the behalf of Gildas Lormeau, just because I actually worked for a while in order to offer some feedback on his extension.
It so happens that Gildas found my remarks useful. It does not help that your criticism of my technical remarks is completely off the mark. You did not understand a word of what I wrote. Your retort is silly, apart from being incredibly rude. And to avoid speaking on behalf of other parties. Nobody needs a self-appointed lawyer such as you.
I just installed Thunderbird to open some. Gee… what a confusing interface! Now that looks as a program designed by committee…. I have the impression some are retired and frustrated individuals who expend their daily small dosis of energy that anyway gets less as time goes in exitement. For those I have the following suggestion: Convert yourself into a single file without any external links, save it and archive it. Do not tell anyone it ever existed.
Those two in particular. If Martin let this pass another tech forum is poisoned. Have just added SinglePage to my install of Brave Dev version early days but seems stable enough for me. Good that I can now use most Chrome add-ons. At present I load the individual html files with my browser, but this is very slow.
So there is blank empty. How can I delete it? SingleFile is a great tool. I use it many times per day several times per hour when I am going though my email and encounter a lot of messages from gHacks or any of the other lists I subscribe to.
Waterfox has been around for years, so I am not surprised that SingleFile Z might not have worked with Waterfox in In mid, I find that all of my favorite Firefox extensions work in Waterfox. Of course, made Waterfox my default browser two or three months ago, so cannot really compare how add-ons run under both browsers anymore. The most convenient part of of SingleFile is that it does not store parts of the page as a separate folder with a similar filename.
Windows pairs them up by filename. This is an amazing extension. I feel sort of emberassed not having used this mechanism earlier. I remember 10 year ago I used to save web-pages in mhtml files but for some reason I switch, I think firefox stopped supprting this format out of the box IIRC.
This is an excellent extension that I use frequently and specifically to avoid the separate folder. I used to use scrapbook which was also excellent, but went the way of the dodo bird when firefox underwent a major update some time ago. A couple caveats for this extension: 1 While it is reasonably fast, many times the save process is very slow on my system.
0コメント